Possible Duper?

[Flashlight237]

Apparently there's two dupers with the usernames Tyson1600 and Lemonaru. Here's the screencap I managed to get: http://prntscr.com/1waqugg
http://prntscr.com/1war1ro

Figured I'd show.

[Savage0]

Theres no proof here whatsoever ..... besides, I'm sure the game just crashes incase a dupe is detected >_> otherwise the economy would look flunky.

$2,500,000,000 in item value would be about $8,999,999,999 if they duped high-end stuff. But who knows? Maybe everyone has a duped item in their inventory ...

[Flashlight237]

Theres no proof here whatsoever .....

They were literally talking about wanting to dupe. Heck, lemon dude went up to me earlier saying "try a thing": http://prntscr.com/1wasrh9

There was clear intent to dupe there. How is that not proof?

[Savage0]

Theres no proof here whatsoever .....

They were literally talking about wanting to dupe. Heck, lemon dude went up to me earlier saying "try a thing": http://prntscr.com/1wasrh9

There was clear intent to dupe there. How is that not proof?

Is this not the same concept as someone saying "I'm gonna kill the president!" in front of white-house guards? Should he get arrested for that? Should people who say their gonna do something awful be judged right away?

Person A: "I'm gonna hack your account!"
Person B: "Reports to the forums: Hey guys, this guy says he's gonna hack my account .... please help by banning him so noone else can get hacked!!!"
Person A: Makes a forum acc: "It was just a joke bro ..."

Basically I think not, you must simply catch them in the act as valid proof.

[Flashlight237]

Theres no proof here whatsoever .....

They were literally talking about wanting to dupe. Heck, lemon dude went up to me earlier saying "try a thing": http://prntscr.com/1wasrh9

There was clear intent to dupe there. How is that not proof?

Is this not the same concept as someone saying "I'm gonna kill the president!" in front of white-house guards? Should he get arrested for that? Should people who say their gonna do something awful be judged right away?

Person A: "I'm gonna hack your account!"
Person B: "Reports to the forums: Hey guys, this guy says he's gonna hack my account .... please help by banning him so noone else can get hacked!!!"
Person A: Makes a forum acc: "It was just a joke bro ..."

Basically I think not, you must simply catch them in the act as valid proof.

What you wrote is a joke example, not an example of real intent like what I posted in the chat screenshots. Seriously, here's more of the convo that I kept around: http://prntscr.com/1wau1ok
http://prntscr.com/1wau3wu

Lemon asked Tyson "gimme your bow, I'll show you how to dupe" and Tyson decided to Google Search it. Yes, Google Search Duping.

INTENT=PROOF

[Savage0]

I would definitely enjoy reading a 12 page response in how my logic is wrong, but I believe that 100+ of the same item (with no visual obscurities or bugs) would suffice, but again, the economy data would catch that, wouldn't it? [unless it doesn't count duped items .... which it probably should]

EDIT: Oh you posted more of this "intent" crap ... -sigh- well hopefully you're correct then ,_, don't wish to go any further with this banter as Robby can just check to see if they're actually duping.

[GingerForever]

Lemon asked Tyson "gimme your bow, I'll show you how to dupe" and Tyson decided to Google Search it. Yes, Google Search Duping.

sounds more like Lemon was trying to scam him :/